sigh

Discuss Quiz Machines here..
User avatar
Istenem
Senior Member
Posts: 5918
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 2:42 pm
Location: the nation's capital
Contact:

sigh

Post by Istenem »

i have been out all day doing a certain game; not because i really wanted to, more that i felt a duty to milk it because i could. cf climbing mountains because they are there. :roll:

i am now £71 richer nett but it was so lacking in edification that i ended up playing for nines. it is not a challenge and i'm bored.

tax-free money might be a living but it is not a life. imo.
nobody ever wins on those things.
roberto la vigna
Senior Member
Posts: 348
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 3:04 pm

Post by roberto la vigna »

PREHEATED and BRILLIANT yesterday. Not much else, as far as I remember.

It's no Word Up, that's for sure.

Give the money to charity? That might cheer you up.

I find that I can play any of these games - however mindless they are - quite happily as long as I make a profit. cf. Monkey Business :D

If you want a challenge, try to beat BESI's mark on this - he's finally managed to be better than me at a word game.
User avatar
Istenem
Senior Member
Posts: 5918
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 2:42 pm
Location: the nation's capital
Contact:

Post by Istenem »

whatever are you talking about Mr Bob? ;)

yes it is free money but isn't it dreadfully dull?
nobody ever wins on those things.
roberto la vigna
Senior Member
Posts: 348
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 3:04 pm

Post by roberto la vigna »

[quote="( o Y o )"]whatever are you talking about Mr Bob? ]

Well, about as dull as free money can be.

The game's quite addictive (bear in mind I find most things addictive) but doesn't offer much variety. What there is of an endgame is pretty straightfoward.

Still: far, far better than the first rendering of the board game.

Am yet to see the itbox incarnation of the Word Cube, somewhat disappointingly.
Mattb
Senior Member
Posts: 5809
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 2:43 pm
Location: Cambridge

Post by Mattb »

All day for £71 isn't bad on SWPs really. When you can make that much in 2 hours on 4 cluedo AWPs though, doesn't compare for me 8)
"Sixty percent of the time, it works, every time!"
nw6
Member
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 5:59 am
Location: London

Post by nw6 »

roberto la vigna wrote: Am yet to see the itbox incarnation of the Word Cube, somewhat disappointingly.
It's gone from the places it used to be at
cool
Senior Member
Posts: 1409
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 11:04 pm

Post by cool »

of course the bottom line is the money you make from swps, however the bulk of the awp players I have come across in my travels by their own admission are sadly lacking in education, swp players are generally not.Most would not get enjoyment from playing awps what do they teach you, where is the intellectual challenge? Playing an swp even the same one gives you a different challenge every day(differing questions),surely for example all cleudo awp's behave in the same way if the input/output level is broadly the same until they get rechipped. Are awp players self taught or are there a few people who sell the information on how to win?
ggdr
Senior Member
Posts: 223
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 3:10 pm
Location: London

Post by ggdr »

Getting back to Sue's choice of game, I offer 1134 (I think) and WOODBINES as early personal bests.
roberto la vigna
Senior Member
Posts: 348
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 3:04 pm

Post by roberto la vigna »

ggdr wrote:Getting back to Sue's choice of game, I offer 1134 (I think) and WOODBINES as early personal bests.
WOODBINES is quality.
User avatar
Istenem
Senior Member
Posts: 5918
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 2:42 pm
Location: the nation's capital
Contact:

Post by Istenem »

in other news, my occasional (real) pseudonym is disallowed on the scrabble scoreboard. it has exactly zero potential to offend unless ~RIM~ is deemed offensive by some namby-pamby klutz.

it is the word for the fella who made horses's spurs and it is allowed in the wordlist (mind you anything is allowed on that wordlist so long as it doesn't exceed nine letters).

it seems peculiar as i'm only 3rd division at scrabble so hardly a pretender to BESI's throne.
nobody ever wins on those things.
fotherz
Senior Member
Posts: 442
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 11:56 am

Post by fotherz »

I'll have to go looking for this one - can't have you two chaps sparring without me. 8)
Mattb
Senior Member
Posts: 5809
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 2:43 pm
Location: Cambridge

Post by Mattb »

It is mundane for sure. The general intelligence level of AWP players is pretty low a lot of the time, and a fair few can be seen dragging their knuckles along the ground and going out with a club to kill dinner. I like to mix both AWP/SWP playing, and i can tell everyone on here is reasonably bright as i don't have to double read posts for bad spelling, grammar and punctuation!
"Sixty percent of the time, it works, every time!"
cool
Senior Member
Posts: 1409
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 11:04 pm

Post by cool »

anybody on this part of the wesite is a learned friend (even those I joust with) with the exception of the person quizmaster had a go at a few weeks ago ......... cant remember his name but he has gone back into further obscurity. I think its good to be able to mix both particularly when things are lean on the swp front. I wish I was good at the word /card games but alas I am not!
User avatar
JG
Senior Member
Posts: 6462
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 2:42 pm
Location: England

Post by JG »

My general knowledge is defintely poor compared with many on this section of the forum. I do like the odd punt on the SWPs, but purely for entertainment. Do any SWPers like the odd punt on AWPs?
nw6
Member
Posts: 59
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 5:59 am
Location: London

Post by nw6 »

Streakypoos wrote:Do any SWPers like the odd punt on AWPs?
I've often wondered that. I don't remember ever playing one. I've seen the damage they can do though.
Locked