Can't find the old WU thread, so I'll just make a new one

Discuss Quiz Machines here..
Locked
Ernest W. Quality
Senior Member
Posts: 540
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 4:08 pm
Location: Leedsish
Contact:

Post by Ernest W. Quality »

But MOTHERFUCKER is.
Image
dmac
Senior Member
Posts: 344
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 6:03 am
Location: ...

Post by dmac »

xyz
User avatar
cp999
Senior Member
Posts: 462
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:59 pm
Location: not where I was yesterday

Post by cp999 »

Northern Monkey wrote:Also an anagram of that SLUT I think is not allowed either- hardly that offensive and I would say not as offensive as say COON
Though SLUT is not allowed, by some curious anomaly of censorship SLUTTY is. I cannot always remember which way round some of the censorship is vis-a-vis Word Soup and Word Blox: so mental note to self:
CLIT ok in Soup but not Blox, C*NT ok in Blox but not Soup.

Here is a Word Soup which would be a real challenge even to VBob:
Attachments
ws_193.jpg
ws_193.jpg (110.24 KiB) Viewed 460 times
roberto la vigna
Senior Member
Posts: 348
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 3:04 pm

Post by roberto la vigna »

Blimey yeah, that's nasty, cp.

Got MILQUETOASTS and ILLAQUEATIONS recently in an odd-word hunting session.
User avatar
Istenem
Senior Member
Posts: 5918
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 2:42 pm
Location: the nation's capital
Contact:

Post by Istenem »

MILQUETOAST is beautiful. personally i'd never heard of it but i like the idea. any luck on getting the GROINWAGON included?
nobody ever wins on those things.
User avatar
grecian
Senior Member
Posts: 1631
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 11:03 am
Location: Near London

Post by grecian »

Istenem wrote:MILQUETOAST is beautiful. personally i'd never heard of it but i like the idea.
Possibly my second favourite Americanism after COPACETIC...
Ernest W. Quality
Senior Member
Posts: 540
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 4:08 pm
Location: Leedsish
Contact:

Post by Ernest W. Quality »

The above screenshot is not dissimilar to some machines on which we have collected several quid. As long as you can still see some letters on some patch of screen, you hve some chance of winning.

From experience, that type of machine tends to be prevalent in bowling alleys.

Got INSECTICIDALLY today. Woo fucking hoo.

As for the swearing censorship, yes they seem only to have censored the most basic swear words out, leaving the longer variants free for us.
Image
roberto la vigna
Senior Member
Posts: 348
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 3:04 pm

Post by roberto la vigna »

Nice one, Ernest.

Yesterday, I got INSTITUTIONAL, ACCLIMATIZED, TRIVIALIZES and, after ploughing in about a fiver in attempts:

XIPHIPLASTRALS

which I claim to be the coolest word played on Word Up thus far. 8)
User avatar
Istenem
Senior Member
Posts: 5918
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 2:42 pm
Location: the nation's capital
Contact:

Post by Istenem »

to know that XIPHIPLASTRALS is in the wordlist and winkle it out is a good effort. kudos Bob.

don't particularly want to go back in to the whole wordlist vs dictionary argument but i had two notable words over the weekend. one was part of 15xx non-clear and gave me great pleasure because of the central Q. the other made me feel a bit sordid because it is not a proper word and contributed to £8.
Attachments
art_137.jpg
art_137.jpg (296.58 KiB) Viewed 287 times
science_211.jpg
science_211.jpg (233.42 KiB) Viewed 286 times
nobody ever wins on those things.
roberto la vigna
Senior Member
Posts: 348
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 3:04 pm

Post by roberto la vigna »

HARLEQUINADE is superb!

Is the first machine at Montague Pyke? I remember the ~PUNGENT nicks being there.
Ernest W. Quality
Senior Member
Posts: 540
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 4:08 pm
Location: Leedsish
Contact:

Post by Ernest W. Quality »

It is like lemonade or cherryade, but of two colours?
Image
fotherz
Senior Member
Posts: 442
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 11:56 am

Post by fotherz »

Had a quick go last night myself...

TRANQUILLISES (boring)
TRANQUILLIZES (boring)
INTENTIONALLY (much better)


Annoyingly, I made a slight foul-up on DISPROPORTIONATE and didnt link the O and N. That would've been a 15, even without LY.
User avatar
Istenem
Senior Member
Posts: 5918
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 2:42 pm
Location: the nation's capital
Contact:

Post by Istenem »

the times has changed its style guide: KHAT is now preferred to QAT

quite right too. you wouldn't dream of spelling KHAN or KHAKI with a Q.
a victory for common sense albeit a small one.
nobody ever wins on those things.
roberto la vigna
Senior Member
Posts: 348
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 3:04 pm

Post by roberto la vigna »

Istenem wrote:quite right too. you wouldn't dream of spelling KHAN or KHAKI with a Q.
a victory for common sense albeit a small one.
Apart from the fact that the H isn't heard in any of these words.
User avatar
cp999
Senior Member
Posts: 462
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:59 pm
Location: not where I was yesterday

Post by cp999 »

*ponders what "should" be the spelling of TALAQ* :D
Locked