worst reds

Firefox · Post by **Firefox** » Tue Aug 21, 2007 11:06 am

theoak wrote:
Matt Vinyl wrote:DNA, X-Rated, the show of red x's meant you were pretty much at most, £20 away from a good top, or series of tops.
As if! :x

<laugh>

Oak, he's right mate, stop looking for a reaction.

Matt, I still have a snailblazer!

pretty reliable once a week too!

Matt Vinyl · Post by **Matt Vinyl** » Tue Aug 21, 2007 12:06 pm

Firefox: Good stuff! I miss my one.

Oak: If you played your steps / exchanges right, you wouldn't have long at all to wait from red x-ing. Still the best variety of Reds by far. Hope they release more, even if they do become more difficult to read...

theoak · Post by **theoak** » Tue Aug 21, 2007 12:26 pm

lol; im not looking for a reaction! and i ASSURE you Im not messing up, I just still have nightmares of a 140 in a CONSTANT red-xing DNA before a top! I of course realise it's an uncommon horror story, yet common enough for me not to be the only one to have experienced it on here!

blackmogu · Post by **blackmogu** » Tue Aug 21, 2007 2:03 pm

DNAS weren't my favorite either.. in an area where they were getting done constantly by other players/rats, they seem to take on a harsher profile. It was always a battle to win out of them, even when showing. The time spent on them versus profit in the end just wasn't working out after a while.

gambogaz1 · Post by **gambogaz1** » Tue Aug 21, 2007 2:19 pm

I have to say I've got an underlying hatred of DNA. When these where in my area(which was a over a good 2 years ago) these where terrible. Fair enough I was a bit of a munter back then. But this machine welcomed me to the £15+ for a board Era!!! I did actually stop playing machines for a while because of this machine. But then Hot stuff came along and saved me.

Scott · Post by **Scott** » Tue Aug 21, 2007 3:43 pm

DNA is nasty this end too, been £100+ in many times and loves too block at £15 for fun.

MrRed · Post by **MrRed** » Tue Aug 21, 2007 7:43 pm

It's a strange one this

I liked DNA but prefered LAB
I know people who love DNA and detest LAB
And the other way round love LAB detest DNA

I find that either can be harsh at times when generally showing

I would disagree on the CCP front
I find these a lot more generous on that £15 to top gamble
If you find one red x-ing early you would be very unlucky to lose on it

ob · Post by ob » Tue Aug 21, 2007 11:15 pm

CCP wins to the top for fun, certainly one of the easier reds to get the top on..

DNA could be a RIGHT bastard to get the top on, had it block it 10+ times ( when red ) before a couple of times, LAB could be similarly harsh, but generally I found it to be better in terms of bigger streaks and easier to get tops

toothless11 · Post by **toothless11** » Fri Aug 31, 2007 12:33 pm

They are all good machines. I don't know why people moan about them if they have them near them. Time them and play them correctly and you will be fine. I would rather have a DNA. LAB, CCP all day instead of some global shit.

Martal~Wombat · Post by **Martal~Wombat** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:02 am

Lucky Devil...................
Just shows how much liked these r,
they havnt been spoke about since July 07!

jeffvickers · Post by **jeffvickers** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 10:11 pm

Played one of these fuckers today. Full with s bucket of money in the bottom, non float day. £80 in for £80 out in 1 hour. Waste of time!

PMK · Post by **PMK** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 1:09 am

I use to think that and then I decided to change strategy on 'em. Now we get along just fine. None around anymore tho.

jeffvickers · Post by **jeffvickers** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 1:39 am

Are you suggesting you just milking instead? Tried a few times, Tenner profit maybe.