Countdown
I think QuizMaster has been outed as a secret Roger Mellie fan! In one of his finest moments (when Viz was officially "still funny"), Roger presented Countdown and from memory all had gone reasonably well until the Conundrum round, when he said that the original set of nine letters was too hard for the mugs they got on the show and so instead he had put the following letters himself - A, R, S, E, H, O, L, S, E ...
More seriously, Countdown has turned out to be exactly what I thought it would be when I first saw it last year - a very faithful adaptation and quite enjoyable to play, with what appears to be fair sets of nine letters and six numbers given for those two rounds (i.e. you don't get 5 Q's and X's or lots of the same number) but it is fundamentally let down by the cowardly prize structures. Winning £1 or (on the Gamesnets) £2 is easily achievable but for anything after that you can forget it. As my doppelganger grecian says, you can't have long term appeal from a game where no one ever wins anything remotely interesting. Sadly that goes for virtually every game that now comes out.
More seriously, Countdown has turned out to be exactly what I thought it would be when I first saw it last year - a very faithful adaptation and quite enjoyable to play, with what appears to be fair sets of nine letters and six numbers given for those two rounds (i.e. you don't get 5 Q's and X's or lots of the same number) but it is fundamentally let down by the cowardly prize structures. Winning £1 or (on the Gamesnets) £2 is easily achievable but for anything after that you can forget it. As my doppelganger grecian says, you can't have long term appeal from a game where no one ever wins anything remotely interesting. Sadly that goes for virtually every game that now comes out.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4166
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 3:33 pm
Yay! Won £1 on this today!
A 6 letter best in dictionary word was followed by a clearance in the numbers game. I think i had to get 115, and i was given 100, 5 and 10. Hmm, tricky...
I also got the conundrum and actually knew the word which made is easier. It was DISSUADES, which isn't too hard to get really.
Matt

A 6 letter best in dictionary word was followed by a clearance in the numbers game. I think i had to get 115, and i was given 100, 5 and 10. Hmm, tricky...
I also got the conundrum and actually knew the word which made is easier. It was DISSUADES, which isn't too hard to get really.
Matt
"Sixty percent of the time, it works, every time!"
Haven't SWP'd for a while now but some of my mates really like this m/c so I've spent a couple of lunch times stood in front of it.
How do you enter a construction like this on the numbers game:
(50 x 2) + (6 x 7)?
I only get:
((50 x 2) + 6) x 7
I guess it's something to do with the 3 little boxes below my numbers - anyone got clear instructions?
Tip: 2 big numbers + 4 small numbers statistically leads to the most solutions/near solutions
How do you enter a construction like this on the numbers game:
(50 x 2) + (6 x 7)?
I only get:
((50 x 2) + 6) x 7
I guess it's something to do with the 3 little boxes below my numbers - anyone got clear instructions?
Tip: 2 big numbers + 4 small numbers statistically leads to the most solutions/near solutions
Yes. You could enter 50 x 2. 100 will then appear in one of the three little boxes to which you refer. Then press 6 x 7 and 42 will appear in another of the three little boxes. Then press 100 + 42 using the numbers you had in the three little boxes. The secret therefore is that there's no need to do one great big sum (this was the problem on e.g. the Countdown handheld game). Treat the three little boxes as memory and call up the numbers from memory. I always go for 1 big and 5 small. Not sure about the statistics but I find that much the easiest way to get to a solution.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 540
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 4:08 pm
- Location: Leedsish
- Contact: