Sharkscope
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4166
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 3:33 pm
Sharkscope
Here's my Sharkscope graph for my William Hill account. It's actually my 2nd (the first one is about $300 down ops: ).
I've been doing pretty well recently - I usually play £5 SNG tournaments.... except for one time during the Whisky Session when I decided to up the ante to £10 after losing about 4 games in a row.
Anyone else fancy posting theirs?
I've been doing pretty well recently - I usually play £5 SNG tournaments.... except for one time during the Whisky Session when I decided to up the ante to £10 after losing about 4 games in a row.
Anyone else fancy posting theirs?
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4166
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 3:33 pm
- mr lugsy
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5776
- Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:19 pm
- Location: looking over your shoulder
- Contact:
mine's not to dissimilar to yours cardinal.lol at the big tilt whilst playing inebriated. i could pull this back into profit any time i could be arsed ,but can i be arsed ? ...not right now that's for sure
basically, without the rake i'm in the black lol.
basically, without the rake i'm in the black lol.
- Attachments
-
- displaygraph_111.png (3.14 KiB) Viewed 2112 times
Misspent late 20s.
I'm approx £3,700 up over all time on all poker, but as I explain to real people in real life and on line people in real life, my average wage would be way less that your average McDonalds employee. However it was good fun. I've only ever been a break even player on ring games, very much all of that £3,700 is from other accounts and from stts. I can't even break micro games half the time.
William Hill is by far the most impressive, then they changed network and I disliked the interface, so I tried Betfair, also a horrible interface, Ladbrokes and Pacific, before finally going back to Hills who now have £ tables. I hate playing in dollars, it's irrational, but it feels like it's not real money and I play too loose.
I have the exact figures in my diary.
I do suspect something is up with on line poker. It doesn't make it impossible to win, just makes it tougher going. Just a little bit too much wierdness for my liking. I also conferred with a Geordie bloke this weekend who plays live poker/BJ for a living and he thought on line poker is full of 'cheetahs'.
I'm a winning stt player and I like low stakes heads ups. Recently my playing time has been vastly decreased. Thing thing I always say about on line poker is it's not the money, it's the time you eat up, playing it.
So I have eased off for the sake of my sanity. Hence a reduction in JG postings at 4:16 am etc
I think as a general rule of thumb 10% of players are winning, 30% more break even and the other 60% lose.
I'm approx £3,700 up over all time on all poker, but as I explain to real people in real life and on line people in real life, my average wage would be way less that your average McDonalds employee. However it was good fun. I've only ever been a break even player on ring games, very much all of that £3,700 is from other accounts and from stts. I can't even break micro games half the time.
William Hill is by far the most impressive, then they changed network and I disliked the interface, so I tried Betfair, also a horrible interface, Ladbrokes and Pacific, before finally going back to Hills who now have £ tables. I hate playing in dollars, it's irrational, but it feels like it's not real money and I play too loose.
I have the exact figures in my diary.
I do suspect something is up with on line poker. It doesn't make it impossible to win, just makes it tougher going. Just a little bit too much wierdness for my liking. I also conferred with a Geordie bloke this weekend who plays live poker/BJ for a living and he thought on line poker is full of 'cheetahs'.
I'm a winning stt player and I like low stakes heads ups. Recently my playing time has been vastly decreased. Thing thing I always say about on line poker is it's not the money, it's the time you eat up, playing it.
So I have eased off for the sake of my sanity. Hence a reduction in JG postings at 4:16 am etc
I think as a general rule of thumb 10% of players are winning, 30% more break even and the other 60% lose.
JG