pros v semi pros v fun players
very good posts particularly from Mr Satis. My income comes in cycles depending on what is on the machines.Yes the machines are pretty rubbish nowadays but I made a lot of money in the early 90's from the simply programmed games like Time Machine , which could not protect itself against further jackpots. I too prefer games that lock up after a jackpot. In the old days a machine called Fruit Machine would protect itself by going to questionmarks and the most you could win is 60p.The paucity of good machines I believe is less about the pro's(as stated there are very few around ) , more about the donuts who will play anything (particularly when pissed!).I have been told by a pro-contact in London that the pro's there regard this site with suspicion and believe that this site is monitered by quiz machine companies,programmers and pub chains,so that they will not contribute to it. I believe that being relatively open we can be one big happy family (almost!).I have always concluded my letters with gaming companies with if I can help you make money,Ill make money.There used to be a person who would put on a m2 high score table GRIMSBY,seen as far from Grimsby as Bristol.Anybody know who he is?
Well, I'm neither a pub nor an average punter but all I can say is that having lived through the days when machines did actually offer decent prizes on a cyclical basis, I know which type I prefer.fazzer wrote:So regular JPs don't benefit everyone - neither the pubs nor the average punters.
An anecdotal point that backs up this view is that it used to be a lot harder to get on machines a few years ago, due to punters already playing when you arrived, and I believe strongly that this was related to the more realistic chance offered of a good win by most games then. Although it was annoying at the time if you had to wait to get on a decent machine, it did mean that people were putting money through the machines more regularly. Now with 80-90% of the games being so poor, I never seem to have any difficult in getting on a machine. I wonder why that is...?
VB, I think that you have some very real issues all of your own.vaginalbob wrote:soiling people's neatly tended scoreboard lawns with giant clearance turds (especially satisfying when a boardful of 1100s by a self-regarding local tyro in a uni grad bar is topped with a solitary 1900+(beating 'CAP' at UEA))

Do you get out much, other than to play WU or WC?
Back on topic, I suggest that there are a lot more "true pros" than you think. I know/have met three in Birmingham alone. They also told me about a bloke who writes questions for games, and plays them for a living. So that makes four in a few miles radius.
I assume cool, and quiz master know a few more, who know a few more, who know a few more...
I'd like all games to have pretty colours.....Can I play the pretty colour game?

BTW, this would all be true if I ever spoke a word of truth, which people like to point out that I don't, so it is best to ignore this, and believe someone else who may not know what they are talking about....
There was a guy from Birmingham who was featured on BBC Breakfast Time years ago who gave his job up & toured the country via the railway network.I bumped into him in a pub called Sovereigns in Woking. I offer an apology to him 10yrs late. I was wrong , you were right concerning the old Monopoly game!
Why not?WaterGate wrote:If you were a pro, why would you tell anyone?
Because you can't make enough money.WaterGate wrote:If you were semi-pro, why would you not be a pro?
Because you can't make any money.WaterGate wrote:If you were a fun player, why wouldnt you become a semi-pro?
Did I ruin the suspense?WaterGate wrote:All these questions will be answered in next week's episode of.....

Yes, I do, although word games inevitably reappear at some stage in any standard social gathering, due to their giving out free money n'all - when you're old enough to play, you'll understand - it's so moreish!BigEd wrote: VB, I think that you have some very real issues all of your own.![]()
Do you get out much, other than to play WU or WC?

(This is assuming you'll make it into the top 1% of players who can win consistently).
What's amusing is that the more posts there are about Word Up - whether positive or negative - the more word games seem to be created in response to the buzz as, of course, games companies have their eye on the site.BigEd wrote:More interesting than the "word up gossip" thread...![]()
In this sense, the WU 'haters' are working hand in hand with the WU lovers to bring more WU clones to the machines - keep it up, guys!

- Istenem
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5918
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 2:42 pm
- Location: the nation's capital
- Contact:
my answers would have been:
Why not?WaterGate wrote:If you were a pro, why would you tell anyone?
in my case i am semi-retired from SWP, i earn more from my job than i could make from playing games and now play them solely for entertainment and beer money.WaterGate wrote:If you were semi-pro, why would you not be a pro?
because you might not be good enough. if everyone was semi-pro there would be no profits for anyone but the operators.WaterGate wrote:If you were a fun player, why wouldnt you become a semi-pro?
nobody ever wins on those things.