Barry Jennings 9/11 WTC7 witness is DEAD
poker pete wrote: you love that word
face facts something is very very wrong with 9/11 - the videos on the internet prove it - but these mind control techiques are easy to use on the general public especially when you have the bbc news sky news etc
you cannot comprehend what is real and what is not real
my advice is to research 9/11
Mr x Mr Y
- Matt Vinyl
- Senior Member
- Posts: 7198
- Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 6:56 pm
- Location: Lost in the outback, Bryan
I'll give anyone their point of view, but even if these videos 'did' show something, you must know how easy it is to 'edit' videos? (I was going to use the verb 'shop', but apparently Adobe discourage that).the videos on the internet prove it
Interesting, I grant you, but anything more than fiction? Probably not...
"And do you ever contradict yourself, Minister?" "Well, yes and no..."
-
Cardinal Sin
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4166
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 3:33 pm
Since you failed to answer my question about the relevance of the Neo's passport in the Matrix, perhaps how you could tell me why hundreds of witnesses describe seeing the planes hit the towers - and not to mention the many many videos shown almost live (if you think it's possible to add a realistic looking plane to lots of videos in the 17 seconds delayed transmission, then you're deluding yourself).
And why are there so few witnesses stating that they heard explosions / saw missiles... could it be that they're either mistaken or hungry for fame?
And if the authorities were keen to dispose of Jennings, would they not have been better doing it in the previous 7 years, and perhaps before he revealed "the truth" ?
And why are there so few witnesses stating that they heard explosions / saw missiles... could it be that they're either mistaken or hungry for fame?
And if the authorities were keen to dispose of Jennings, would they not have been better doing it in the previous 7 years, and perhaps before he revealed "the truth" ?
Matt Vinyl wrote:I'll give anyone their point of view, but even if these videos 'did' show something, you must know how easy it is to 'edit' videos? (I was going to use the verb 'shop', but apparently Adobe discourage that).the videos on the internet prove it
Interesting, I grant you, but anything more than fiction? Probably not...
good point you mention there take a look at this video
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zQTsiLX3XbA
its called tv fakery - no plane hits the wtc
later in the evening news they insert a fake plane.
Mr x Mr Y
Thats the funniest thing I've ever read.
TV FAKERY???? IT's called that particular reporter is obviously directly on the other side of the towers so doesn't pick up the incoming plane.
I sat and watched everything unfold live on television, There is no way a plane didn't hit the WTC!!
You want take up train spotting or something, Give you a bit more purpose to life!!
TV FAKERY???? IT's called that particular reporter is obviously directly on the other side of the towers so doesn't pick up the incoming plane.
I sat and watched everything unfold live on television, There is no way a plane didn't hit the WTC!!
You want take up train spotting or something, Give you a bit more purpose to life!!
betchrider wrote:You go upto a bird and grab her quim and say "im gonna knock the fuck outta this" and see what happens
-
Cardinal Sin
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4166
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 3:33 pm
Even the 9/11 Truth Commission refutes the claims that there were no planes.
And I'm afraid that 1 piece of grainy footage (which would probably be a lot easier to doctor than the hundreds of videos showing the plane) does not prove your point.
Now perhaps if you tried to convince me that America knew that the attacks would place and chose not to stop them, then you might have a point. But by repeatedly citing a few piece of anomalous evidence, whilst conveniently ignoring the vast amounts of evidence to the contrary - you leave yourself open to ridicule. Even more so when you try to start talking about the Simpsons and the Matrix. (and of course, you ignore the thousands of dates which appear in films which don't tie in with your theory).
And I'm afraid that 1 piece of grainy footage (which would probably be a lot easier to doctor than the hundreds of videos showing the plane) does not prove your point.
Now perhaps if you tried to convince me that America knew that the attacks would place and chose not to stop them, then you might have a point. But by repeatedly citing a few piece of anomalous evidence, whilst conveniently ignoring the vast amounts of evidence to the contrary - you leave yourself open to ridicule. Even more so when you try to start talking about the Simpsons and the Matrix. (and of course, you ignore the thousands of dates which appear in films which don't tie in with your theory).
Cardinal Sin wrote:Since you failed to answer my question about the relevance of the Neo's passport in the Matrix, perhaps how you could tell me why hundreds of witnesses describe seeing the planes hit the towers - and not to mention the many many videos shown almost live (if you think it's possible to add a realistic looking plane to lots of videos in the 17 seconds delayed transmission, then you're deluding yourself).
And why are there so few witnesses stating that they heard explosions / saw missiles... could it be that they're either mistaken or hungry for fame?
And if the authorities were keen to dispose of Jennings, would they not have been better doing it in the previous 7 years, and perhaps before he revealed "the truth" ?
do you know what The Matrix movie is all about? watch the movie, download it.
why choose september 11th 2001 as the expirey date on the passport - answer has to be that our freedom has all but gone that day - why you think there bringing ID cards out with microchips holding data about us - the next procedure will be planting microchips inside us. its all part of the New World Order which George Bush Sr has spoken about in 1991 (september 11th) Gordon brown has also mentioned the New World Order in his speech
In the movie Indenpdence Day as Air Force 1 evacuates the President and his family, Jeff Goldblum sets a laptop up to watch the countdown. When the camera cuts to a close-up one of the ticks is 9:11:01.
http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Hollywood_911.htm
ok now watch this video reporter does not see a plane
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=bqjKeBS1J ... re=related
The news on 9/11/2001 was highly organised with most likely CIA insiders working and spreading false information- hundreds of witnesses did not see planes crashing into the WTC.
Mr x Mr Y
gambogaz1 wrote:Thats the funniest thing I've ever read.
TV FAKERY???? IT's called that particular reporter is obviously directly on the other side of the towers so doesn't pick up the incoming plane.
I sat and watched everything unfold live on television, There is no way a plane didn't hit the WTC!!
You want take up train spotting or something, Give you a bit more purpose to life!!
knowledge is power
show me 3 plane wreckages
911 - "No plane hit the pentagon" report on the day!
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=SFz7gLz7CVk
Mr x Mr Y
-
Cardinal Sin
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4166
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 3:33 pm
I didn't realise that the people who made Hollywood movies were the same people who were responsible for orchestrating major terrorist operations on US buildings.
And perhaps most damning of all - the work required to achieve all this (including editing hundreds of video clips) must have been phenomenal. Yet we've never heard of 1 whistleblower who could blow the lid off the entire operation.
All it would take is 1 credible witness to substantiate your wild claims. And yet no witness has ever come forward, except for a few folk in New York who were quite obviously traumatised by the whole affair.
I remember a documentary about the Loch Ness monster where they made a plank of wood appear out the water when they were a bunch of tourists standing nearby. Of course they all saw it and were incredibly excited. But when it came to describing what they saw on camera, many people started describing seeing eyes, scales, teeth and all sorts of things - on a plank of wood.
The mind plays tricks on people. Get over it.
And perhaps most damning of all - the work required to achieve all this (including editing hundreds of video clips) must have been phenomenal. Yet we've never heard of 1 whistleblower who could blow the lid off the entire operation.
All it would take is 1 credible witness to substantiate your wild claims. And yet no witness has ever come forward, except for a few folk in New York who were quite obviously traumatised by the whole affair.
I remember a documentary about the Loch Ness monster where they made a plank of wood appear out the water when they were a bunch of tourists standing nearby. Of course they all saw it and were incredibly excited. But when it came to describing what they saw on camera, many people started describing seeing eyes, scales, teeth and all sorts of things - on a plank of wood.
The mind plays tricks on people. Get over it.
-
Cardinal Sin
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4166
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 3:33 pm
Oh, and I do urge anyone who hasn't looked up that conspiracy site Mike has posted to look at it straight away. It's hilarious...
http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Hollywood_911.htm
This is my favourite:
Film: Rugrats in Paris (2000)
Time: 00:02:22
Scene: Struggling to dance at a wedding ceremony Chuckie's shoelaces get tangled. He counts along with the beat, 'Nine, eleven, twenty…'
And Independence Day - yes indeed the bomb timer does show 09:11:01... it also shows a lot of other numbers as it counts down (in fact, you'd be hard pushed to get a timer which didn't show 09.11.01) .
http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Hollywood_911.htm
This is my favourite:
Film: Rugrats in Paris (2000)
Time: 00:02:22
Scene: Struggling to dance at a wedding ceremony Chuckie's shoelaces get tangled. He counts along with the beat, 'Nine, eleven, twenty…'
And Independence Day - yes indeed the bomb timer does show 09:11:01... it also shows a lot of other numbers as it counts down (in fact, you'd be hard pushed to get a timer which didn't show 09.11.01) .
Dr. Reynolds exposes 9/11 TV fakery on FoxNews
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=reQZT9Hzvt8
Live Chopper 4 NBC No Plane Dim Orb vs 2 Stored NBC Tiny Orb
(TV FAKERY)
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=q4YoC14qi ... re=related
New Video Overlay proves clearly 9/11 TV Fakery
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=bfDg2rX9J ... re=related
9/11, no plane hit WTC
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=wOPx8bs_X ... re=related
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=reQZT9Hzvt8
Live Chopper 4 NBC No Plane Dim Orb vs 2 Stored NBC Tiny Orb
(TV FAKERY)
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=q4YoC14qi ... re=related
New Video Overlay proves clearly 9/11 TV Fakery
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=bfDg2rX9J ... re=related
9/11, no plane hit WTC
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=wOPx8bs_X ... re=related
Mr x Mr Y
- Matt Vinyl
- Senior Member
- Posts: 7198
- Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 6:56 pm
- Location: Lost in the outback, Bryan
Cardinal, that link is classic! Mike: Have you not realised that there would be countless, countless films that you could find any other combination of numbers you thought were 'meaningful'. What's the term for the human mind finding patterns in something where there is no pattern? I'm sure the Cardinal will refresh my memory, but this is clearly a case of what is occuring here...
"And do you ever contradict yourself, Minister?" "Well, yes and no..."
