Eliminator

ZAX · Post by **ZAX** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 2:05 pm

Anyone else played it?

Just wondered if you too have come across the progressive and imaginative way it appears to have of keeping it's % payout regular ie not paying out at all if you win too much. That's a new one! Or perhaps I just got skanked.

Reckon this one has some addictive qualities anyhow. Not one for the Q&A overlords though.

Nil Satis · Post by **Nil Satis** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 2:29 pm

I've had one brief look at it at the weekend and I can certainly see that this one might well have a lot of punter appeal and it may also have some money available in it if you catch it right.

What do you mean by not being paid though? i.e. what precisely did it do?

P.S. Are 'overlords' more powerful than 'real boys'?

ZAX · Post by **ZAX** » Fri Mar 06, 2009 5:11 pm

I mean if you win anything over a quid- which is not that hard, it just doesn't transfer the money into your bank. A quid- no problems. Otherwise nothing. I reckon this could be pretty popular as well. It reminds me of some old Paul Daniels gameshow which fortunately I have blotted from my memory- can't recall the name of it

QuizMaster · Post by **QuizMaster** » Fri Mar 06, 2009 6:14 pm

Wipeout

kingzilla · Post by **kingzilla** » Mon Mar 09, 2009 10:19 am

Played this on a gamesnet but not seen any problem like this, do you remember what platform it was on?

mr lugsy · Post by **mr lugsy** » Mon Mar 09, 2009 10:43 am

Nil Satis wrote: P.S. Are 'overlords' more powerful than 'real boys'?

i think an overlord would be quietly confident if pitted up against a 'real boy'

dmac · Post by **dmac** » Fri Jul 10, 2009 9:07 pm

Nil Satis · Post by **Nil Satis** » Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:23 pm

Ah, but was that a correct answer or not?