Page 1 of 1
What the?
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 1:29 am
by Alpine021
Just curious why have my 2 posts been deleted. If there is a problem or it's sensitive it's fine just delete it and pm me....?
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 7:37 am
by harry2
Probably sensitive. Might be worth keeping to yourself. You never know who reads these boards.
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 9:06 am
by Matt Vinyl
Hmm, not me mate - I saw you made a flurry of posts yesterday but didn't see anything overly sensitive?!
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 9:11 am
by gambogaz1
I asked about this in the lounge last night as I'd posted twice on it. Funnily enough thats now been deleted.
Would just be polite if the person who doesa it PM's the people for the reason why it's gone.
So it's either Admin,JG or Lugsy as I wrongly pointed the finger at MattB last night

ops:
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 9:31 am
by Matt Vinyl
What were the threads about guys (in general!)?

Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 9:34 am
by gambogaz1
Of all things Star wars.
Alpine asked if it's worth playing, I said I'm doing alright on them, he asked if they do dodgy tops so I did a rough list of what tops I've had so far, and added that they seem a more fair game than R2R.
Don't know if anyone added anything on afterwards but they where gone within about an hour and half.
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 9:44 am
by Matt Vinyl
Ah yes, I remember reading that. Perhaps someone did add something afterwards?
I personally don't bother with Star Wars as I think the opposite - that it's tighter than R2R:
-More frequent deaths below £4/£3
-Masks can be really high up the cash stack
-11s and 2s do you when very low down
That lower than a 10 for the final red mask was pretty good though - you wouldn't see that too often!
Have you seen it's clone: "Rainbow Riches"? That seems ever so slightly more generous on the gambles / 'exchange pot' level on the cash stack, but still not an overly engaging machine...
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 9:59 am
by gambogaz1
I've seen a RR once but that was in manchester and a hi/lo had got my attention so didn't bother with it.
To be fair on star wars I've based my opinion of forceability. I've took loads of R2R's on from SS ready and still taken an age to go in only for a flat £35
Wherein SW seems to respond much better to the force. Maybe I'm just on a good run with em but since I started playing em just before xmas the worst result has been evens and I've forced them every time I've played em. 1 is in an arcade on 70% the other 2 are pubs 1 78% the other 70%
The arcade one is the only 1 I've had a £70 SW off
but overall the most profitable has obviously been the 78% unit in a town centre.
Not yet had a natural IM off it yet. But I prefer the randomness of it wherein for instance saturday I got the top from just my 3rd feature shot.
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 11:59 am
by flashback
Someone must have mentioned the rip.
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 12:19 pm
by mr lugsy
o.k guys i'm back afer a week away ,whilst i've been watching the site via my mobile ,i've not deleted anything myself ,not really that sensitive anyway as far as i know.
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 2:04 pm
by silent g
what fucking rip?
not the cydi rip thats too shit to mention and as for the r2r style starwars there isnt anything on it apart from the 2 cluedo features (nr & guac) wich everyone knows anyway and are posted in a thread somewhere and nr feature is poo anyway i had it stop at 1 number (1).
so who ever did delete the threads is worrying over fack all.
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 2:10 pm
by betchrider
silent g wrote:what fucking rip?
not the cydi rip thats too shit to mention and as for the r2r style starwars there isnt anything on it apart from the 2 cluedo features (nr & guac) wich everyone knows anyway and are posted in a thread somewhere and nr feature is poo anyway i had it stop at 1 number (1).
so who ever did delete the threads is worrying over fack all.
Somebody asked for em to be deleted but it was cos of that talk.Bollocks i know!
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 6:55 pm
by bigpokercouk
this site is more censored then chinese television lately
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 7:00 pm
by Matt Vinyl
LOL! I don't think there's been that much censoring at all recently - with the exception of something in the Red section, that's all we're aware of?!
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 10:05 pm
by JG
I haven't deleted anything for a long while, it wasn't me.
I'm going to do a post on this machine in relation to what gambo is saying anyway. At the moment I rate this machine as
"Rather pointless"
No, change that,
"Completely pointless"
More to follow soon.