Page 1 of 1
Ye Olde Gaming House of Yore
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 11:33 am
by LordOoze
For what seems like the first time in an age I actually won in the casino! Hurrah.
A run of tier when I was playing tier and later a run of orphelins whilst I was playing them. Both outside bets hit a double and the orphelins did double 34 and then double 1.
A laudable raise of 4k.
Time to have a break from the spinny ball game methinks. lol
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 12:03 pm
by harry2
Invest it quick in something illiquid.lol. Nice to win.
Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 12:17 pm
by LordOoze
Lol. Straight in savings and isa. Got my withdrawal limit reduced to zero over the counter...so hopefully they won't get it back....
Double cheese burger and a ho???
jj
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 8:20 pm
by LordOoze
Another solid result. Got a GATW on a bell fruit. Then went casino and hit double 17 followed by double 14. I was actually playing orphelins lol.
Methinks time to have a casino break and go back to the tuppenny nudgers
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 9:12 pm
by silent g
i know im stoned but someone tell me if im wrong in asking,
what the f*ck is this thread all about ?
what the feck are tyre's and orphans ?
im lost, people are talking about wheels and kids with no parents and savings accounts.
Posted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:54 pm
by pickareel
sick game.......sick raise
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 3:55 am
by LordOoze
Towards the Silent One:
It is roulette and tier is 12 numbers directly opposite 0 and orphelins are the numbers between tier and ~6 either side of 0.
Despite the overwhelming urge to go back in I maintained a null appearance today.
On a 3 card poker note
25 on fronts and 75 backs - lost with the following hands:
Q,10,9
K,Q ,6
A,K,J
8,8,A
Flush
2,2,K
This game does my nuts lol
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 5:18 pm
by pound
LordOoze wrote:Towards the Silent One:
It is roulette and tier is 12 numbers directly opposite 0 and orphelins are the numbers between tier and ~6 either side of 0.
Despite the overwhelming urge to go back in I maintained a null appearance today.
On a 3 card poker note
25 on fronts and 75 backs - lost with the following hands:
Q,10,9
K,Q ,6
A,K,J
8,8,A
Flush
2,2,K
This game does my nuts lol
you have winners there on pair plus dont you ?
Yep another 1 who dont understand if im wrong ?
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 11:54 pm
by LordOoze
Yeah get a win for hands > pair for the pair plus.
Though the hands like Ace high etc losing was my general gripe. Big backs and all losses
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 11:59 pm
by LordOoze
Q,10,9 ......£200 loss - could've been £100 profit
K,Q ,6 ......£200 loss - could've been £100 profit
A,K,J ......£200 loss - could've been £100 profit
8,8,A ......£150 loss - could've been £175 profit
Flush......£25 loss - could've been £275 profit
2,2,K ......£150 loss - could've been £175 profit
net loss: ~£900
could have won: ~900
<Famous last words 'could have won' > lol