Page 1 of 1
lucky t****
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 12:19 am
by maverick69
ive had enuf of these fools goin all in with 5 7 off suit and catching flushes i kno we all get bad beat but that was just ridiculious well pissed off :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x :x
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 1:29 pm
by pokerpete
didnt we just read a story of you handing out a 9/2 out draw and scooping a massive pot, before scuttling away with the money?
http://www.fruitchat.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=7154
you have to be able to take the beats as well as hand them out
if I know for a fact you have A,A I am more likely to win with 5,7 suited than QQ.
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 10:48 am
by harry 3
Exactly why Gus Hansen wins so often, he "knows" what you have. His cards are "irrelevant".
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 6:27 pm
by mjd
thats just daft..
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 9:08 am
by pokerpete
what is?
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 6:15 pm
by mjd
'Gus hansen knows what people have'
Thats daft. You make assumptions yes, but those assumptions are not guaranteed to be correct!
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 7:16 am
by harry 3
True, but he makes a lot of final tables, his instincts are better than most.
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:06 pm
by mjd
Thats right yep, But Its like most other things, theres millions of poker players out there, so someone is bound to be the most successful..
I think the WSOP is open to anyone? So anyone from a rich background can enter, and if they do half decently (which in a game with so much luck involed is more than possible) they are considered 'professionals' just because they are there! and have a Decent stack!
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2007 11:06 pm
by acen123
Doesnt WSOP Main Event have very long blind levels? The slower the blind increases, the more play in a tourney and in theory should promote skill & experience versus blind luck. The PKR one i play has 15 min blind levels though i suppose higher stakes have longer blind levels & deeper stacks?
Posted: Thu Jun 28, 2007 1:06 pm
by pokerpete
2 hour levels
starting with 10,000 chips
blinds
10/20 i think
deep stack poker is more skillful but with 8000+ players it's still a bit of a lottery. with a field that large which does include the best players in the world, it can't be won by a complete mug but there's no guarentee it'll be won by a top player either.
Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 11:26 pm
by Dibble
The pros consistently do far better in these tournaments than the average Joe. I disagree that its only open to people from rich backgrounds. Both sites I play at offer freeroles to gain entery to the WSOP, and various stages to suit all budgets.
I have a friend going to one of the events at the WSOP ($2k) and he is not from a rich background. He has just made a lot of money playing the game. Anyone who thinks its luck is a player who has not fully grasped the concept of poker. Ok people get sucked out on but you wont often find top players ever going all in pre flop with anything less that the top 3/4 permium hands.
During varioust SNG's and MMT's its routinely the same people I see at the final tables.
Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 1:34 am
by mjd
thats fair enough.. but to be in the WSOP your instantly considered a 'pro' even in round one!
Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 12:42 pm
by pokerpete
not at all. the standard of play for the first couple of days is shocking in the main event. The big boys do well because they are better at exploiting bad play from amature mugs, of which there are plenty in the WSOP.
Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 12:43 pm
by pokerpete
..