Tops paying Minimum

mjd · Post by **mjd** » Sat Apr 05, 2008 12:30 am

your thoughts please...

Its definately a common thing now. Infact Nowadays im suprised when a top goes for more than the minimum. The Barcrest is the fruit machine equivalent of the Berlin Wall

Mattb · Post by **Mattb** » Sat Apr 05, 2008 12:38 am

Not at all. Games Medias love to do £70s and £105s, and reds do big tops all the time too.

AMK · Post by **AMK** » Sat Apr 05, 2008 1:02 am

depends on the situation. yes GR/Warped/etc do normally go for a 70/105 or 35 then 105 or even 70 then 105! golden game grands are where the money is! these can do 175 tops within the light streak!!!

thecannonball89 · Post by **thecannonball89** » Sat Apr 05, 2008 5:43 pm

barcrest never do a £25 top

Nixxy · Post by **Nixxy** » Sat Apr 05, 2008 9:54 pm

MJD - are you referring to Reds doing flat tops, or machines in general?

If you're talking only about Reds, I think they do a lot of staggered streaks, yes.

jonnyg323 · Post by **jonnyg323** » Sat Apr 05, 2008 10:36 pm

From my experience, red are awful, BF and BC are ok and games media are the best. But there is an important difference.

On machines like extremes, games media and BF you know if you have filled the machine enough for the eventual top to be £50+. On reds, i find it IMPOSSIBLE to know this. Thats wat i find anyway.

Mattb · Post by **Mattb** » Sat Apr 05, 2008 11:47 pm

Obviously playing them wrong then. Why not guarantee yourself a minimum of two top features by playing them properly!

AMK · Post by **AMK** » Sat Apr 05, 2008 11:57 pm

had a warped 1st quid today 2 for the survive red £70 top. got to love these hehe

mjd · Post by **mjd** » Sun Apr 06, 2008 1:09 am

machines in general, accidentally posted it on Red because a Snakez & Ladderz gave me a minimum last night... Fortunately it didn't cost me owt

jonnyg323 · Post by **jonnyg323** » Sun Apr 06, 2008 2:48 am

Mattb wrote:Obviously playing them wrong then. Why not guarantee
yourself a minimum of two top features by playing them properly!

Im awful on reds

Every other manu i can handle but reds confuse the hell out of me. Achilles heel if you will.

Stopnstep · Post by **Stopnstep** » Mon Apr 07, 2008 12:21 pm

jonnyg323 wrote:
Mattb wrote:Obviously playing them wrong then. Why not guarantee
yourself a minimum of two top features by playing them properly!
Im awful on reds Every other manu i can handle but reds confuse the hell out of me. Achilles heel if you will.

Well i'm glad you said that as Reds are one of the best for repeating. SMTM and SNL not as much but previous reds loved to repeat. Compair this with Barcrest's and BF repeats and there's no comparison.

jonnyg323 · Post by **jonnyg323** » Mon Apr 07, 2008 1:37 pm

I prefer boards where you can move around myself - the result may be the same but the gameplay excites me more than simply hi-lo the whole time.

The few times i have managed repeat tops it has been solid £105s or £70s in one go, never staggered as always seems to be ARB1 again.#

Edit: repeat tops on reds

toothless11 · Post by **toothless11** » Wed Apr 09, 2008 10:37 am

It seems that reds nowadays love their staggered streaks, but if played correctly you should get too out of them at least. Other manu's such as barcrest are terrible lately whereas games media do love 35+ including 70s/105s.