Page 1 of 2

For Sale!!!! (I think)

Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 10:23 am
by Cardinal Sin
Saw this on some lamp-posts in Glasgow

Image


I'm not quite sure why I like this so much...


It could be that you that from first looking at it, you don't have the first idea what they are selling. It might be good and friendly with kids, but I've still no idea what a "full luctur" is.

Then they mention it's a puppy they're trying to sell. But why have they drawn a picture of a sad face? Are they abusing this puppy?

Further on, we realise that there is a sale on, and the price is now £30, reduced from £100 (not be confused with the £250 price at the top of the ad, not to mention the £3,000 in the middle).

And at the bottom: not only do you get the 9 week old abused "FULL LUCTUR" puppy, but the price also "INCLUDES EVERYTHING"...which is a bit vague but legally I think it means you can take every possession they own.

But can anyone spot the funniest thing about this advert?

Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 am
by Istenem
i agree,, it does have a perplexing charm.
is it the bewildering use of parenthesis?

Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 10:53 am
by Cardinal Sin
That was part of its allure, but that's not the funniest thing about it!

Should really have stuck this in the quiz section, if that garlic-soaked Louis XIV hadn't beaten me to the right answer (if it is right).

Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 3:40 pm
by Demmerz
Perhaps the reflection of the two pigeons in the sellotape?

Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 3:44 pm
by Mattb
I think that the original ad was:

For sale - 9 week old puppy. £30, was £100

It appears someone has added the rest on, as the ink doesn't match the other bit. Am i right? :D

Matt

Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 3:47 pm
by Matty
Typical Glasgow for you ! :lol: £30 for a puppy thats just wrong !

Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 4:02 pm
by Demmerz
The ball point writing is under the tape though and it looks like the handwriting is the same with the rollerball 'for sale.....' writing.

Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 4:04 pm
by Cardinal Sin
All good ideas (most of which I hadn't noticed myself). Particularly like the idea that someone has added to the original ad, but it unless they were a master counterfeiter, it would be hard to copy the handwriting as well.

I'll rephrase the question:

What is the biggest mistake the person made when writing the advert?

Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 4:21 pm
by Istenem
just got it and people in my office were wondering why i started laughing.

dozy tart didn't put any phone number etc.

Posted: Fri May 19, 2006 4:37 pm
by Cardinal Sin
BINGO!

edited to say: nice bit of sexism on the part of UP there.

Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 4:22 pm
by Istenem
this is one of the best posts ever. :lol:

Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 4:33 pm
by Cardinal Sin
:o ops: I'm blushing!

Still, your post-resurrection has exposed this woman (or man's) stupidity to whole new generation of Fruitchatters.

Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:49 pm
by Matt Vinyl
dozy tart
nice bit of sexism on the part of UP there.
Probably un-misplaced though! (surprised that wasn't on the the poster!)

I missed this the first time around, excellent!

Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 8:10 pm
by Guest
Pure comedy
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 10:38 pm
by Mattb
I remember this one.....and being a dunce for not getting the right answer :o ops:

Tres amusing though! :D