Politics!
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2014 7:30 am
I honestly believe whoever is Prime Minister does not run the country, that the big decisions are all made behind the scenes and merely presented by the elected 'face'... I believe the banks run the world (Rothschild ones in particular) and they are effectively the bosses of every government. I'd like to know what everyone else's views are on the whole 'democratic' system and why...
Putting it simply, I believe that every election year you vote for Cunt A or Cunt B... perhaps even Cunt C - but whoever you 'vote' for is gonna do the same thing because he/she is just a face. Of course the government we elect does handle local issues, I speak of the international agendas, issues involving royalty - the establishment...
Does anyone actually take it at face value? Does anyone actually believe that UK and USA really go and spend billions on 'helping' other countries who don't appear to have democracy just because they feel good about it and not for their own financial gain in the long run? I can't work out why this country is cutting spending on its own issues but sending/spending billions on 'helping' others? Same in USA... after the New Orleans disasters, there was no money to recover dead bodies and clean the place up - but there were billions to spend on sorting Iraq and Afghanistan out!
Would just like to know your opinions!
Putting it simply, I believe that every election year you vote for Cunt A or Cunt B... perhaps even Cunt C - but whoever you 'vote' for is gonna do the same thing because he/she is just a face. Of course the government we elect does handle local issues, I speak of the international agendas, issues involving royalty - the establishment...
Does anyone actually take it at face value? Does anyone actually believe that UK and USA really go and spend billions on 'helping' other countries who don't appear to have democracy just because they feel good about it and not for their own financial gain in the long run? I can't work out why this country is cutting spending on its own issues but sending/spending billions on 'helping' others? Same in USA... after the New Orleans disasters, there was no money to recover dead bodies and clean the place up - but there were billions to spend on sorting Iraq and Afghanistan out!
Would just like to know your opinions!