£XXX bank on Empire Strikes Back?

[Mr McStreak]

I'm sure, giving your location, that players nationwide will be falling over themselves to assist you.

[GaryChandler]

[clarkey1984]

Yeah but the maximum repeat is not 2 Jackpots.... even if stated

Apart from the LAW states that it HAS to be a max amount of £210, 2 repeats on a 70 to be legal, which means this must have been an old rip that no longer exists, as you wouldnt be shouting all over youtube about if it it could still make money for you, im sure you would keep that to yourself if you still had a worker, loose lips cause rechips ya know

The 210 rule was one of the conditions that had to be met in order to allow the £70 jackpot machine to be brought into use so i have heard, i cant remember where i heard it for sure, i think it was an arcade tech somewhere that mentioned it.

[ob]

Yeah but the maximum repeat is not 2 Jackpots.... even if stated

Apart from the LAW states that it HAS to be a max amount of £210, 2 repeats on a 70 to be legal, which means this must have been an old rip that no longer exists, as you wouldnt be shouting all over youtube about if it it could still make money for you, im sure you would keep that to yourself if you still had a worker, loose lips cause rechips ya know

The 210 rule was one of the conditions that had to be met in order to allow the £70 jackpot machine to be brought into use so i have heard, i cant remember where i heard it for sure, i think it was an arcade tech somewhere that mentioned it.

quite right clarkey, anfield road is talking shit here, there is 2 repeats maximum on a jp, hence why when u get the 2 repeats on such games as £70 777 pots of gold for instance (just an example of a game that COULD actually do the repeats here), it says "maximum number of repeats reached" on the display.

Anyone who says any different is talking shit, which is not uncommon on here eh!

[Spyder]

yeah, 2 repeats is the max but the removed link only had 2 anyway...

but theres still blatantly summat going on with it... and obviously dond gold too...

someone tell me both please?

[Spyder]

HAS IT GOT SOMETHING TO DO WITH THE BLAH AND DOO DAH??

[anfield road]

so because it says it cant do it then that means it cant?? are you sure about that

[clarkey1984]

Yes, if it has been decided that it cant pay more than 210 on repeats by law which it has, then it cannot legally pay more than 210 on repeats in a normal situation because the law says so, so the only likely reason that this happened is a fault in the prog somewhere that causes it to do so, a rip or other malfunction i would guess, which would have been rechipped / repaired prettyfuckingquickly!

The gambling commision (among other organisations) govern these kind of things very tightly and if a machine was made that could go past 210 on a repeat chance accumulation then it would not have been authorised for release until it had been adjusted so that it could not go past 210, unless there was a rip or something that was not picked up while the machine was on test before release.

[Spyder]

i think someone should pm me this... cause then i can go to the wetherspoons in *&^%$ and win loads of money

[darren]

so because it says it cant do it then that means it cant?? are you sure about that

This is true, a machine could do a £700 top if it wanted. And whos gonna complain?

[thecannonball89]

Its not a jp its 5spaceships

[anfield road]

belled up

[Reel King]

why don't you all go and look up the differerence between a legacy and a non-legacy machine.

should stop all the bickering


all new machines are of course non legacy and are governed by new rules

[anfield road]

I was just stating that machines can repeat for more than £210 it may be illigal but they do it!! Empire could repeat 8 times would bell up but you know it could do it

[betchrider]

5 times most ive ever seen it say!