Spurs were pretty close to 1.3 last week at home to Hull and they drew.
There's a big difference between odds of 1.2 and odds of 1.03 i.e if you think 1.2 is a safe bet, you are 7 times more likely to win at 1.03, and 20 times more likely to win at 1.01.
Put simply, however, if it takes you 235 games to turn £10 into £10000 and you're betting at 1.03, you should mathematically lose 7 times. So you've got to avoid those potential 7 pitfalls.
As a fun exercise where the risk is a tenner, i think it's inspired
QM
Stupid punters. Telly all the week, screw the wife Saturday
joe3_3 wrote:
The price for Man city on tues was 6/5 with Ladbr0kes.
(2.2/1decimal odds)
Just before the kick off I got 4.1/1 for city on betfair!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yes I should not of put /1 in my example put simpler £20 on city with ladbrokes would of returned £44.
With betfair it returned £82, though bet fair make their money by charging around 5% on winnings.
So 5% of winnngs of £62= £3.10.
So after commision I got back about £78.90, still alot better than the £44 on the high st!
QuizMaster wrote:
There's a big difference between odds of 1.2 and odds of 1.03 i.e if you think 1.2 is a safe bet, you are 7 times more likely to win at 1.03, and 20 times more likely to win at 1.01.
QM
FALSE.
Odds are made up via other peoples opinions, they are not law.
Hope this helps, probs why your accumlater thread is so shit.