Fruit Machine Chat

people who think they are rigged are just plain stupid to be honest, its just people trying to give an excuse for them being complete addicts, forget the times they have only covered a couple of numbers and ones comes it but always remember the bad times.

anfield road wrote:

Jackrack wrote:Fobt roulette, no matter how much people say they are rigged, are not.

They make so much on them, there is no need to put their company on the line..

Often i have stuck 10 quid in, and covering very little numbers, with 0 having 2 quid on, and 0 coming in.

I have never seen 20 blacks come in as often as it does in the bookies in the casino!!

How often do numbers double up in the bookies? Its rigged to a certian degree... I reckon over a set ammount or something

That is true - random number generators (or whatever FOBTs use) are some kind of computer, whereas casino use a human to spin it, so it is totally random.

if the numbers were replaced by random symbols; maybe ≈, å, ø, ~, •, ∞, 0, ÷, ∆ etc. you could still find a pattern if you wanted to. but the 0 is still there to give the house edge. the numbers are meaningless.

anfield road wrote:

Jackrack wrote:Fobt roulette, no matter how much people say they are rigged, are not.

They make so much on them, there is no need to put their company on the line..

Often i have stuck 10 quid in, and covering very little numbers, with 0 having 2 quid on, and 0 coming in.

I have never seen 20 blacks come in as often as it does in the bookies in the casino!!

How often do numbers double up in the bookies? Its rigged to a certian degree... I reckon over a set ammount or something

the reason you see more 20 in a row blacks on FOBTs is that every spin lasts 30 seconds max rather than a few minutes so you get way more spins!!!

Also I have never seen more than 10 red/black in a row on FOBT's over thousands and thousands of experiences, your experiences therefore are just pure coincidence.

You do get a totally disproportionate amount of mug offs on these though, seen it so so many times it's just unbelievable. Still it makes no odds, the bookies rake in thousands and thousdands off them, roulette is by far the most addictive casino game, and the one that will financially ruin you the quickest too.

It's also pretty much globally accepted. You don't get a load of Kossovans piling around the £5 Flashback in JG's Amusements do you?

In my experience it is luck itself that is rigged.

I wonder how the seeding is done from the RNG though. Some of the sequences appear to be very non-random.

ob wrote:

anfield road wrote:

Jackrack wrote:Fobt roulette, no matter how much people say they are rigged, are not.

They make so much on them, there is no need to put their company on the line..

Often i have stuck 10 quid in, and covering very little numbers, with 0 having 2 quid on, and 0 coming in.

I have never seen 20 blacks come in as often as it does in the bookies in the casino!!

How often do numbers double up in the bookies? Its rigged to a certian degree... I reckon over a set ammount or something

When doing lucky 8's i saw 15+ straight red/blacks loadsa times! ended up costing me profit cos thats when i used to try 20 on opposite


the reason you see more 20 in a row blacks on FOBTs is that every spin lasts 30 seconds max rather than a few minutes so you get way more spins!!!

Also I have never seen more than 10 red/black in a row on FOBT's over thousands and thousands of experiences, your experiences therefore are just pure coincidence.

God knows how my post got in the middle of that!

rigged

I've seen 18 blacks in a row on a FOBT. Statistics suggest that 18 of any colour would occur once in 208,000 spins !

harry2 wrote:I've seen 18 blacks in a row on a FOBT. Statistics suggest that 18 of any colour would occur once in 208,000 spins !

There's no need for racist remarks.

barneybear wrote:

harry2 wrote:I've seen 18 blacks in a row on a FOBT. Statistics suggest that 18 of any colour would occur once in 208,000 spins !

There's no need for racist remarks.

Den some bumberclot honky played it. Ta-rass.

well played on one of these on sat with a £5 stake, come off with £150 must have had about 20 successfull spins in a row despite just covering sometimes as little as 5 numbers, clearly machine needed to dump some cash. Would love to see the inner workings of these machines. Anyway as I have have said I would still play them even if they said they were not random just like I play fruity's.

In Summary cant accept they are random but still enjoy playing them providing I stick to my allocated stake. Used to be terrible on these things for chasing 'fav' numbers. Out of interest whats everyone fav number? normally the 0 will have the biggest covering for me and the numbers around it.

Allways 0 if i was gona do a £10 spin it'd be something like £5 zero £2 26+32 50p 3+15.......................................................

9 for me, mad how much I've made from that number!