Page 1 of 1
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 12:17 am
by tka
Not that I can agree but I would if I could.
It is bullying.
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 10:33 am
by QuizMaster
Can't boycott Millionaires boys. It would halve my weekly income!! I will continue to not play Hangman though, as it is a game for muppets. Not sure about Cluedo - still waiting to see this new one by them.
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 10:37 am
by Istenem
i thought the new one was by someone else (channel1?)
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 5:03 pm
by QuizMaster
Ooh is it? That's a shame. Cluedo's always been good for a few quid. Their games are mean as fuck. (PTT excepted, obviously).
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 8:59 pm
by tka
Is WWTBAM really worth playing? I've not tried it in 6 months because it's boring, I'm quite good on GK (except random sports) but haven't given 50p to Tarrant for ages.
And yes, new cluedo (or test cluedo) was/is Channel 1 (almost identical start screen to Monopoly with 'secret messages etc.)
Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 9:43 pm
by Demmerz
So how about you start boycotting Channel 1 as well!!
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2005 9:12 am
by WaterGate
Pish!
First post - why is Hangman bad???
Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2005 11:31 pm
by Guest
Hello, I get the odd fiver out of Hangman and use Q Music Quiz occasionally if it's being tight - Can I ask why Hangman is considered bad?
I'm not insulted by the Game for muppets comment but would genuinely love to know why it's no good and what the recommended game to play if you want to win?
Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2005 9:59 am
by Istenem
1. the old version (H2) is learnable
2. it takes forever (there are many other games where you can win quicker)
3. the new version (HHH) is explained by (i think) EWQ in another thread
4. it is boring
5. it's the sort of game where mug punters play it (maybe for £3, £4 or £5 until they get a £1 win, take the money and bugger off, you'll be lucky to hit one that hasn't paid out last game