Gambling Commission questioning the legality SWP's

Discuss Quiz Machines here..
dmac
Senior Member
Posts: 344
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2008 6:03 am
Location: ...

Post by dmac »

xyz
User avatar
Nil Satis
Senior Member
Posts: 1497
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 6:55 pm
Location: South East

Post by Nil Satis »

dmac wrote: We may play them for different reasons but I'm not sure that we play them in dramatically different ways. To be fair, there have been times over the last year when you have said there is no money in quiz machines while I have been making quite a bit out of them. I am sure QM etc. are still taking good money out the things even if I can't be bothered.
As it happens this has been my second best year so far since I started keeping detailed records a good few years back, and might well end up being my best. I've never said there is no money in ALL quiz machines/games, but what I certainly would say is that there is no worthwhile money in 90-95% of games. It's how the number and availability of the small set of decent games varies that determines what rewards you can take from the hours you put in. At times there have been as many as 10 freely available games with what I would consider to be worthwhile money offered in the right circumstances, but my version of that list is now down to around 5 and all of those are more than a year old now. Others will of course have their own version of that list, and their own idea of what 'worthwhile' means.
kingzilla
Senior Member
Posts: 312
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 5:29 pm

Post by kingzilla »

Has there been any news as to what they are going to do?
kingzilla
Senior Member
Posts: 312
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 5:29 pm

Post by kingzilla »

Anyone got any news on whats happening?
Barry Trotter
Senior Member
Posts: 296
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 2:43 pm

Post by Barry Trotter »

Released on the gambling commission website this week...

http://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/pd ... 202009.pdf

You can say goodbye to Skill Ball Bingo, Poker, Skill Quest, etc...
User avatar
mr lugsy
Senior Member
Posts: 5776
Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 12:19 pm
Location: looking over your shoulder
Contact:

Post by mr lugsy »

there's always the chance that standalone 'skill' ball for instance will just have the amld paid on it and the jpt raised to 70GBP( :wink: ) so they then are legal,these things do take a lot of money afterall.

it's defo bye bye to some games though it would seem.
Image
User avatar
grecian
Senior Member
Posts: 1631
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 11:03 am
Location: Near London

Post by grecian »

Barry Trotter wrote:Released on the gambling commission website this week...

http://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/pd ... 202009.pdf

You can say goodbye to Skill Ball Bingo, Poker, Skill Quest, etc...
Good. And from a brief look at that press release, it doesn't mention compensators / chance games designed to look like skill etc., does it - hopefully they have realised that such things are key to the viability of SWPs for all players.
User avatar
quizard
Senior Member
Posts: 890
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 10:33 pm
Location: It's grimmm up north

Post by quizard »

Unless the GC/HMRC actually start prosecuting operators you can't really see such faux gambling games disappearing in hurry. Since it is going to lose operators loads of money they are naturally going to try and put it off as long possible.
Give Us A Break 30th Anniversary
cool
Senior Member
Posts: 1409
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 11:04 pm

Post by cool »

Blatant example of dodgy operator tactics.......
Gamestec Itbox monopoly £1 a game £50 jackpot.
punter puts money in 50p a game £20 jackpot.
User avatar
Been-Grant-Mitchell'd!
Senior Member
Posts: 957
Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 12:03 am
Location: West Sussex

Post by Been-Grant-Mitchell'd! »

Nil Satis; what is your avatar from?

Looks like a wall from Winchelsea in Sussex.
borgcontact4

Post by borgcontact4 »

Hi Boys,
Looks like some games will also go. Add to Poker, Roulette, Bingo and fruit style reel style games but now add Deal or no Deal and Monopoly as these are games of chance ....
Well at least we still have fruits!!!
User avatar
Nil Satis
Senior Member
Posts: 1497
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 6:55 pm
Location: South East

Post by Nil Satis »

[quote="Been-Grant-Mitchell'd!"]Nil Satis]

No, it's this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Rupert%27s_Tower

You'll have to read the article to understand the reference!
Barry Trotter
Senior Member
Posts: 296
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 2:43 pm

Post by Barry Trotter »

borgcontact4 wrote:Hi Boys,
Looks like some games will also go. Add to Poker, Roulette, Bingo and fruit style reel style games but now add Deal or no Deal and Monopoly as these are games of chance ....
Well at least we still have fruits!!!
Well at least you didn't post the outcome of a private meeting on a public foru m... oh hang on, you did....

Tit
User avatar
quizard
Senior Member
Posts: 890
Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2006 10:33 pm
Location: It's grimmm up north

Post by quizard »

Barry Trotter wrote:
borgcontact4 wrote:Hi Boys,
Looks like some games will also go. Add to Poker, Roulette, Bingo and fruit style reel style games but now add Deal or no Deal and Monopoly as these are games of chance ....
Well at least we still have fruits!!!
Well at least you didn't post the outcome of a private meeting on a public foru m... oh hang on, you did....

Tit
Why was this a secret or something?
Barry Trotter
Senior Member
Posts: 296
Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 2:43 pm

Post by Barry Trotter »

Not exactly secret... but there is a lot of discussion to be done between any interested parties before anything becomes concrete. Therefore, as nothing is set in stone, it would be better for people in the industry not to mention anything that was said that could in any way jeopardise HMRC thoughts... Its entirely possible they would read websites like this to try and gain inside information. And whilst the games that borgcontact mentioned ARE skill, and HMRC are no doubt trying it on with a very badly worded piece of legislation which no doubt never intended to stop SWP's in the guise of board games, anything anyone says which adds credence to their cause is making a bad situation worse. It would be sensible not to mention anything that hasn't been mentioned in a public statement.

And as borgcontact is no doubt in the industry, he should have known better than to post anything other than fact on this board!
Locked