Page 2 of 2

Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:32 pm
by tka
Compared to you guys I am shit at word games but 3 years ago there was good money in them. I can clear maybe once in 20 on WU but when it as £20 that was very good money.

Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2006 1:35 pm
by Guest
tka wrote: I can clear maybe once in 20 on WU but when it as £20 that was very good money.
Aye, for sure. Do you think the new word game on the itbox has the potential to be lucrative? I still haven't spotted one.

Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2006 2:10 pm
by tka
I didn't manage to clear it so not sure about whether it might be a moneymaker. I played 2 games on it, first game easy quid second game i did much better but no prize. For bonus time you need to make target words (easy 3 letter words) rather than use JQXZ tiles. also it has a trophy room as well as top scores but you can only have 4 letters in your name.

Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2006 6:15 pm
by Guest
What's the jackpot?
tka wrote:but you can only have 4 letters in your name.
oh well, VBOB it is, then.

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 3:42 pm
by Guest
Both Fotherz and I (independently) played this today. We broke 6500 but haven't managed to clear the first screen yet.

The game is good fun - I especially like the way you can use tiles that were previously hidden as they are uncovered, even in the same word.

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 4:28 pm
by Istenem
what are the winning prospects Bob?

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 7:38 pm
by Guest
Reasonable - I won £3 first ever go (was first to play the game on that machine) and then got about £3 more in £1 instalments. Dunno what the jackpot is.

Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 1:21 am
by Ernest W. Quality
I played this for the first time today. 4500 was my best, but was a bit tired and unsure of the rules. I got a lot more points for GLITZY than QUIZZERS so I'm not sure of the scoring rules yet, though didn't stop to work it out.

Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 9:48 am
by Istenem
had a couple of goes, wasn't too impressed. it is not a patch on WU, imo it's good but it's not the one.

Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 11:53 am
by Ernest W. Quality
I thought it was good,