Page 3 of 3
Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2011 11:38 pm
by mr lugsy
High five vince,and well done for that result.
And to be fair to pete ,I read the small print on stan James site ,it's pretty much word for word standard online gambling blah,blah, to be honest,check it out if you don't believe me.
If they didn't want to pay all that money back there was nothing that any amount of complaining would have achieved .
My own experience of online gambling combined with the outcome of this scenario would rate Stan James site very highly in comparison with sites achieving much,much,higher footfall in the world of online gaming.
All things considered I think it was pretty much commendable That they paid up. Imagine if had been Mansion or someone
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 7:37 am
by Stevie S
mr lugsy wrote:High five vince,and well done for that result.
And to be fair to pete ,I read the small print on stan James site ,it's pretty much word for word standard online gambling blah,blah, to be honest,check it out if you don't believe me.
If they didn't want to pay all that money back there was nothing that any amount of complaining would have achieved .
My own experience of online gambling combined with the outcome of this scenario would rate Stan James site very highly in comparison with sites achieving much,much,higher footfall in the world of online gaming.
All things considered I think it was pretty much commendable That they paid up. Imagine if had been Mansion or someone
I know Lugsy mate, it's only a bit of innocent banter
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 10:37 am
by pokerpete
Stevie S wrote:GET THE FUCK IN THERE BIGV ME OLD SON
Stevie S 1 pokerpete 0
As I said, they don't HAVE to give it back but they could well do as a gesture of good will.
Online customer services 1
cynical gambler who thinks everyone's trying to rob him 0
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 10:41 am
by Stevie S
pokerpete wrote:Stevie S wrote:GET THE FUCK IN THERE BIGV ME OLD SON
Stevie S 1 pokerpete 0
As I said, they don't HAVE to give it back but they could well do as a gesture of good will.
Online customer services 1
cynical gambler who thinks everyone's trying to rob him 0
Come on pete, put your ego in the bin and admit you called this one wrong.
ops:
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 10:45 am
by Stevie S
pokerpete wrote:I do play a lot of poker, but it's not my job (anymore)
I work in online gaming. I know what I'm talking about.
and it's not up to a reader to find sources for another posters assertions.
If you state a "fact" in a discussion, really, it's your job to back it up.
Could you also inform me of what online gaming company you work for so I know which one to give a wide birth, thanks in advance petey
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 10:53 am
by pokerpete
No, I called it right.
Fair play to Stan James for allowing Bigv to keep his ill gotten gains.
I don't work for a site.
I would have thought it was fairly obvious who I work for actually
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 10:56 am
by Stevie S
pokerpete wrote:No, I called it right.
Fair play to Stan James for allowing Bigv to keep his ill gotten gains.
I don't work for a site.
I would have thought it was fairly obvious who I work for actually
Halifax Bank Of Scotland maybe? You called it right pete, well done.
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 10:57 am
by Stevie S
pokerpete wrote:he won't lose out.
he also won't get away with anything.
Spot on pete.
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:36 am
by pokerpete
I then went on to say...
pokerpete wrote:with all I said, it's not impossible they'll let you have the £1280 as a gesture of good will and take the loss.
They just don't HAVE to legally.
let us know.
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 11:38 am
by pokerpete
Stevie S wrote:pokerpete wrote:No, I called it right.
Fair play to Stan James for allowing Bigv to keep his ill gotten gains.
I don't work for a site.
I would have thought it was fairly obvious who I work for actually
Halifax Bank Of Scotland maybe? You called it right pete, well done.
In a former life I did work at Barclays actually.
Worst three years of my life that was.
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 2:40 pm
by keno
keno wrote:Nevermind the £840, your balance should read £1280 once they have sorted it out.
I've had similar problems in the past, admittedly not with Stan James, but they have credited my account with my balance with what it was before the fuck up/error.