Golden charms pots of gold
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 242
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 5:08 pm
Why mess with a ton ?
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/zGCdBsOIKYA&hl ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/zGCdBsOIKYA&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/zGCdBsOIKYA&hl ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/zGCdBsOIKYA&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
Roulette free since December 2011.
I've played Rainbow Riches in Ladbrokes ever since it came out, and must have played through thousands. Lost overall of course, and I've still never even SEEN the pots come in.
Not for me, nor for anyone else. Yet the values never seem to get really high - maybe I'm just unlucky on these.
Still, I had some lucky a few weeks ago getting £500 from the feature on Winderella in the arcade. I think on this one if you get 2 pumpkins you get the third for the Winderella feature. The top pot for £500 also stayed at that even after I'd won, which is unusual for these machines, but probably wont be won again for years!
Not for me, nor for anyone else. Yet the values never seem to get really high - maybe I'm just unlucky on these.
Still, I had some lucky a few weeks ago getting £500 from the feature on Winderella in the arcade. I think on this one if you get 2 pumpkins you get the third for the Winderella feature. The top pot for £500 also stayed at that even after I'd won, which is unusual for these machines, but probably wont be won again for years!
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 2191
- Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 3:46 pm
- Location: Norfolk
Neither had I until my friend was playing it last week.mrdave wrote:I've played Rainbow Riches in Ladbrokes ever since it came out, and must have played through thousands. Lost overall of course, and I've still never even SEEN the pots come in.
Gold was on £500,Silver was £151 and Bronze £156.Needless to say it gave the bronze but thats the first time I've seen it,not that I play the thing alot but have watched alot go through it in the time they've had these in the bookies.
Try party time and get the feature 'Lets party' for £1 and then get pooper over and over,then you can feel pissed right off alright!
Ladbrokes are starting to piss me off, (apart from Reel King which at least seems to give you a chance now and again), I played New York New York, got the 10 free spins and won absolutely NOTHING off them.
Then it gave me one extra free spin for £2. Totally shit sort of returns on these when you think it's £1 a go.
Then it gave me one extra free spin for £2. Totally shit sort of returns on these when you think it's £1 a go.
wow that is sick! as an aside, having played this reel king sim on here, I've managed 3 jp's having not played it that much (£2/go), pity I never got that lucky in real life on themmrdave wrote:Ladbrokes are starting to piss me off, (apart from Reel King which at least seems to give you a chance now and again), I played New York New York, got the 10 free spins and won absolutely NOTHING off them.
Then it gave me one extra free spin for £2. Totally shit sort of returns on these when you think it's £1 a go.
RE: the roulette guy
id have split the money between 11 7 and 20 and rebet that... fuck, he only doubled up.... couldve ended up with millions if he'd gone on one number.... funny thing.... more or less anyone in the world would've put it on "LUCKY" 7 lol
all the casino did was raise the limit allowed on a 1/1 bet, he could probably have gone in there without the camera and put the table limit on a number and they wouldnt have cared if it came in or not... because he brought the odds to nearly 50% chance of not losing, a one number bet would have been too high risk for him, so he wouldnt have gambled it, whereas the table limit on red/black is lower so the casino doesnt take to many hits from a 50/50 coming in....
dunno what he was trying to prove... if he wanted to do this, he should have flipped a coin and if he lost the call, give all his money to a charity.. not a fuckin casino??????
does any of what i wrote make sense? bedtime me-thinks....
id have split the money between 11 7 and 20 and rebet that... fuck, he only doubled up.... couldve ended up with millions if he'd gone on one number.... funny thing.... more or less anyone in the world would've put it on "LUCKY" 7 lol
all the casino did was raise the limit allowed on a 1/1 bet, he could probably have gone in there without the camera and put the table limit on a number and they wouldnt have cared if it came in or not... because he brought the odds to nearly 50% chance of not losing, a one number bet would have been too high risk for him, so he wouldnt have gambled it, whereas the table limit on red/black is lower so the casino doesnt take to many hits from a 50/50 coming in....
dunno what he was trying to prove... if he wanted to do this, he should have flipped a coin and if he lost the call, give all his money to a charity.. not a fuckin casino??????
does any of what i wrote make sense? bedtime me-thinks....